Puella Magi Wiki - User contributions [en]

User talk:TheresaFrog421

2026-08-25T00:43:42Z

Belankt294842: Nope.

== Interacting with bots ==

Hello! I wanted to inform you that the user you interacted with "What" to was a bot. In the future, I would recommend not interacting with them and to let moderators handle it. Have a good day. [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 14:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

== Kuro ==

Just letting you know, but くろ and 黒 are not their last names – both are different ways of writing "kuro" in Japanese, so it's just a difference in spelling. Do you still think it's worth including that information on [[Kuro|this page]]? (I'm not trying to say it's not worth it; I'm letting you decide.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 06:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
:Honestly yeah, I know there's the little description next to their name but if Magireco added the くろ and 黒 as a way of differentiating them, I don't see why the kuro page shouldn't, and it helps me identify them quicker. (Also i got the idea of it being a last name because of [[Kuro (くろ)|Kuro's (くろ)]] etymology section where it calls it that) --[[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 10:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
::I mean, sure, it is technically their last name. "Kuro" is presumed to be their surname, not their given name. But your phrasing seemed to imply you were thinking of "Kuro" as the first name and the Japanese characters as the surname, which is not the case. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 14:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

== Deletion requests ==

Please don't blank the page when requesting for it to be deleted. Just add the deletion requests category. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 15:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:If you're talking about ''Magia Exedra Story Transcripts/Magia Record Main Story - Rumor of the Anonymous AI/Portrait Story'' then I wasn't the one who deleted the content, it was EPF (they created and edited the page so I can't blame them) I only added the deletion request category (I guess I can't prove it since the page is gone). The only proof are [[Puella Magi Madoka Magica Portable & Mami's Heart-Pounding Tiro Finale Grief Seeds]] and [[Minor Oriko Witches]] still having their content (I "moved" them to [[Madoka Magica Grief Seeds]] and [[Oriko Magica Witches]] respectively) - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

== Memory Windows ==

It seems you missed the Symbol Witch and the Mirror Witch? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 21:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:Yeah I'm not the one who extracted them out of the files so I can't really find them on my own. I was hoping to get them through EPF's google drive but it seems like theyre not updating it currently so I got them from the Exedra wiki. They dont have the symbol, mirror and two forms of stagecraft window. I'm REALLY not good with any file extracting so I'm sorry that I can't look for them myself. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 22:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
::Okay, that's fair. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

== Rumor of Walpurgisnacht ==

<blockquote>"I need help, I wanted to change the walpurgisnacht rumor to the eng dub one but I genuinely CANNOT hear what uwasasan is saying in some parts T_T"</blockquote>
Are you not using closed captions (cc)? It should help you. ~ [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 00:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
:The only ones I can use are the translated ones, when I want to upload the official english rumor. If you or anyone else has the real english cc it would help T_T. --[[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 07:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

== Gallery moves!? ==

Wait, why are all the gallery pages being moved? We already went to the trouble of making Gallery: be a proper namespace. What's the problem with having the galleries in their own namespace? Is there some reason why they absolutely have to be subpages? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 04:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
:At first I saw Amaterasu doing it, and since I was changing [[Template:Navbox Anime Gallery]] I decided to just go with it and start moving them. Tbh I shouldn't bring Amaterasu into this but since they're way longer on this wiki and their changes were just left unquestioned I assumed everyone was okay with them, and I wanted to help ཀ ʖ̯ ཀ. I can still change them back even if it takes time but please while you're here delete the redirects I put in [[:Category:Deletion requests|deletion requests]], they're extremely unnecessary. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
::The use of subpages is more efficient, in my view. It allows you to quickly link back to the main page, and I think it's better than simply using "Gallery:", since it also makes it clear that it isn't a new page, simply a part of the page. I probably didn't explain this well, I just woke up. ~ [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 12:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:::Yeah, I agree with gallery subpages too. Another bonus is searchability - you have to preface everything with Gallery: if you wanna search for pages in that namespace, they don't appear otherwise. Which kinda sucks. However I'm also pretty sure we're using some cursed old search extension. [[User:EPF|EPF]] ([[User talk:EPF|talk]]) 17:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

::::Though, you could also argue that not appearing in searches is a ''good'' thing. Someone searching is more likely to want the article than the gallery. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 00:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

== CSS ==

Regarding [https://wiki.puella-magi.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Witch_Card&diff=next&oldid=193460 this edit]: I'm not sure what you were going for, but you misspelled "margin-top". It has a hyphen in it, not an underscore. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:27, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
:Tried checking it again and it still doesn't work, on some pages the name box appears on the same position as the witch display but on others (like [[Minor Magia Record Witches and Doppels]]) its a little bit lower, it might be some other part of the code though. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 09:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

== Tabbers ==

I noticed you're experimenting with the new <nowiki><tabber></nowiki> tag that was recently installed. Please be sure to watch out for pages that link to specific tabs, as the fragment (the part after <code>#</code>) completely changes with the new system. So, just changing a page to use the new tabs instead of the old potentially breaks links silently with no warning at all. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 04:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
:Okay, I'll check if the Iroha edit I made broke any links, for now Im focusing on making empty Exedra Event pages but I'll remember it - thanks! - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 04:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

== Star ==

Why are you changing the star? The memoria cards clearly use eight-pointed stars, not five-pointed stars. That's why I used an eight-pointed star in the category names. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]])
:On my laptop the star was a blank box (🟎) Idk if Safari doesnt understand that symbol but it just looked broken. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:01, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
:I checked and it just doesn't work on Safari, even if its made with html (🟎). Ive found ones that work, ✵ and ✴ (there are other eight-pointed stars but only these are rotated correctly), I prefer the first one. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:20, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
::So basically it's an issue of you don't have a font with that character. Of the two stars you found that ''do'' work though, I think the second is actually more suitable. The first is "eight-pointed pinwheel star", and it's not solid black unlike the other two. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:59, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

== Enemy elements ==

Do you have a specific order that you think the elements should be shown in for the "enemies" section on the memory window pages? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:18, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:They appear in that order in the suggested element section before a fight and the fight itself. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:22, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::So you haven't really checked if the order is always the same then. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::I mean?? I never saw them appear in any other order, so I do just assume that it stays the same. If that's not the case then yeah it should be changed. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::I looked through them a bit. It looks like the game is always listing them in the same order that they appear in the upgrade/crystalis quest lists. At least, I didn't see any that contradicted that order. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:39, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::Okay that's good, also while you're here what do we do with the Scene 0 enemies? From what I got its a lot of enemies from other quests, but Im worried its gonna be almost too many of them. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::I guess the first step would be collating an actual list of the enemies used in Scene 0. Only then can we decide whether it seems like "too many". ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 21:13, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I watched someone play the standard version and this is the list, but I'm pretty sure on Battler and Nightmare there are more unique enemies. Also they all have Aqua Forest and Light weaknesses. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 21:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::#Gertrud
::::::#Anthony
::::::#Adelbert
::::::#Ulla
::::::#Charlotte
::::::#Pyotr
::::::#H.N. Elly
::::::#Danniyel & Jennifer
::::::#Anja
::::::#Elsa Maria
::::::#Sebastian's
::::::#Bartels
::::::#Oktavia
::::::#Patricia
::::::#Roberta

== Ponta ==

Thank you! You totally anticipated what I was about to ask for with that gallery edit. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 19:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

==Full Photos==

May I ask where the recent Full photos came from? I really want to see if there's other ones, especially of ones I like :) I'm referring to these (Sayaka Kimono Full 2.png, Sayaka Kimono Full.png, Ren Christmas Full.png, Rika Christmas Full.png, Shizuka First Sunrise Full.png) ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 20:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
:The "Event Files" I mention in the upload summaries are specifically in [https://pi.rika.ren/magica/resource/image_native/effect/story/ this folder of the Magireco File Archive]. Sadly, there's not a lot of these full renders. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
:: Thank you.. (╥﹏╥) ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 06:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

== Templates category ==

Is there any actual point in [[:Category:Templates]]? If you need a list of all templates on the wiki, [[Special:AllPages]] is clearly better (no need to manually categorize them all). Other template categories are fine, but I don't see the point of that one. (Maybe there ''is'' a point I'm missing? I don't know.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 02:36, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
: Yeah its not ''that'' needed, but I do think it's a bit nicer than [[Special:AllPages]] just because of how Category pages look. I don't see it as redundant, just a tiny bit better alternative (Even if it is kinda annoying to categorize them manually). - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

== Edit Summary ==

It would help a lot if you remembered to fill in the edit summary when you edit. We wouldn't have had to have the recent double revert if the original edi summary had explained why you removed that link, for example. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:33, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
:Yeah I sometimes just think its obvious enough what the edit is for, sorry. Then again please check what the edit actually did before reverting it, cause it was pretty obvious that it linked to the wrong image. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:02, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
::I did. The two images were similar enough that linking them was plausible, so it wasn't as obvious as you thought. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 12:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

== Inline Icon ==

It feels like your use of Inline Icon on the enemy info pages doesn't really fit. It's meant for embedding an icon into the flow of text, but that's not what you're doing there. Is there any reason you can't just drop the icon image in directly like <nowiki>[[Image.png|link=Magia Record Items]]</nowiki>? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:48, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
: Changed. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
: Oh yeah, does [[Magia Record Enemy - Symbol Witch Minion IV (Haunting Chairs)|Echo IV]] have any drop items? It seems like it should, but I cant find what it would be. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:07, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
:: Sorry, I have no idea. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 12:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

== Progress Reports ==
I'm not good with css, or templates, but I was thinking if we could make a template similar to the progress report at the bottom of [[Timeline]]? I was thinking a way to just list the entries as integrated/finished and non-finished and then have the progress bar automatically update. Perhaps even only using parts of them in the articles they belong (like the Timeline for Null only has the progress report for Null) but Timeline has all of them (as well as additional lists for Retellings and Unknown Placement). I can make the lists and fill them in, but I wondered if it would be possible to make that asset as a template that can be edited, so that it can be universal across pages that use it. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 16:04, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:What exactly do you mean by "automatically update"? It's a bit vague, and sounds like it could be quite tricky. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 16:07, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:: I mean the progress bar automatically updates in accordance to what is finised and what is not finished. (Like if the finished list has three elements and the unfinished has two, the progress bar would automatically just calculate to 60%). To also explain the example with Null that I brought up: the template, when its used on pages, can just be edited to which parts are visible and which aren't. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 16:10, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

: I think maybe with [[Module:ArrayParameter]] it could be possible? To list something you would have to put it in a new parameter, and im pretty sure Array Parameter can count how many parameters there are (if done right obv). Then just do some math to show how much is done in %. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::So basically you're saying that completion percentage would be based on comparing a "target list" with a "completed list"? It sounds doable, but probably not easy, and likely requires a module to do properly. (Not [[Module:ArrayParameter]], but a dedicated module just for this purpose.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 16:15, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::: It works right now but is kinda annoying when trying to change not done stuff to done (cause you have to change a lot of numbers). I still dont think its worth its own module, but maybe theres some way to make it count the <code>*</code>s in a parameter and then calculate the progress bar with that? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 00:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

::: You can see my example at [[User:TheresaFrog421/Sandbox#Template]], its messy and looks bad but what counts is that it works. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:27, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:::: Okay I improved it to look like it does on [[Timeline]] (not 1:1 but thats not possible). - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:13, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::::: Oh that's perfect! Can we make it so that it's usable for the files? Or at least for [[Timeline]]? I can then populate each entry for each timeline, as well as the Retellings and Unknown Placement like before. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 17:48, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:::::: What do you mean by "files"? The Wishlist? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:52, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

: I do think it's worth its own module. Then you could write it like this:
<pre>{{Progress
|done1=thing
|done2=thing
|notdone3=thing
|done4=thing
|done5=thing
|notdone6=thing
}}</pre>
: The key point there being that done and not done elements share the same numerical sequence, so marking something done is just a matter of deleting "not". ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 00:51, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:: That would already be nicer than the current setup but if the module could just count the amount of bulleted point items it would be even easier, it would look like this:
<pre>{{Progress
|done=
* Thing
* Thing
* Thing
|notdone=
* Thing
}}</pre>
:: I'm not sure just how much a module can actually do so.. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 00:57, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::It can do pretty much anything, so counting the *'s is certainly possible. I'm not too happy with that idea though. If it's expected to ''always'' be a straight bulleted list without any tree structures, then I think it makes more sense for those *'s to be in the template instead of in the page; whereas if there's any tree structures, or any situation where it wouldn't be a bulleted list, then counting the *'s gives the wrong answer. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:38, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: I mean yeah but in both scenarios its a bulleted list, I dont really know what other lists it could be, at most one where #s are used, or a tree list, but in both scenarios those can be easily managed no? I mean the #s can be counted with the *s and for a tree structure, if a <code>:*</code> is used instead of <code>**</code>, it shouldn't change anything. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 02:14, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::: Still, with your method, the edit to mark something done will show as deleting it from "not done" and adding it to "done", whereas with my method it will show as "changing it from not done to done". It might not make much difference if only one or two are marked done, but if you mark several done all at once I think it would look messier with your method. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:51, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::: I think it all depends on how it will look on the page itself really, right now the done and not done are fully separated, which my idea would fit better. But if it looked like:

'''Madoka Magica'''
* Episode 1 (Done)
* Episode 2 (Done)
* Episode 3 (Not done)
* Episode 4 (Not done)
* Episode 5 (Done)
* Episode 6 (Not done)

::::::Then yeah your idea would fit better. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:00, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::Even then I think it would be better if the module just counted the ammount of "(Done)"s and "(Not done)"s. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:52, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

== Enemies ==

I added the enemy list for Please Yuna-san, but I ran into one issue. Sakuya, Ranka, Ao, and Hikaru appear as regular enemies in Waves 1–4 of the Hundred Evils Challenge stage, but they also appear as bosses in Wave 5. In this case, should they be split into separate Boss and non-Boss entries? - [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 20:24, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
: Yeah then both should be listed. Also do you have a good source of what enemies appear in what events? I [[User:TheresaFrog421#Enemies to confirm|have a whole list of pages that have missing enemies]] and I predict it will only get bigger. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:28, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:: [https://magireco.moe/] should have information for most Challenge, EX Challenge, and Hundred Evils Challenge stages. However, the site is in Chinese, so it may take some time to translate the information. Also, it seems that the site is no longer being actively maintained, so it may be unstable and sometimes inaccessible. - [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 20:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:: Also, it seems that the Magical Halloween Theater event was held in a PvP format at the time, so the event itself does not have any enemies. -[[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 21:04, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

== Reverting Official But Wrong Translations ==

I can understand wanting to keep the "official" translations but when they're done poorly and incorrect more often than not, we probably want to keep better translations *somewhere*. In the case of Paola there's specifically items missing from the official translation present in the original JP text... that's kinda significant. [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 21:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
:The nature is missing from the official translation right? Yeah its pretty significant, but I still prefer sticking to the official descriptions. I can get behind putting it in the trivia that the nature is missing from the english text, but outright replacing the official translation is wrong. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 07:04, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

== User reaching out ==

You like witches? I like witches. Let's talk witches? But where, and how? (excuse me if I mucked up the editing, its been many years.)
[[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]]) 23:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

:I don't really know what you mean, but I'm up for discussion ^^. And it would be best just here. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 11:58, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

What do you like most about the witches? Your profile implies you do, since a section asks for more witch content. I also wish more witch lore. Like for example how exactly familiars grow into witches, we are told little about it.
Or how much of the magical girl's soul is 'lost' when turning into a grief seed. It looks to me like the main personality is shed and only the subconscious ego remains as a witch.
You can check my profile for some of my old contributions [[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]])

I honestly like everything, but if I HAD to choose its probably the striking difference between a Magical Girl and a Witch, I mean Sayaka has only 3 colors in her outfit but Oktavia has so many, to me it feels like what the person looks if they werent bound by a human body. About the familiars, I wish we got more proof of familiars growing into Witches ''and being diffrent''. Im pretty sure Sarah Mirabilis W confirms that its been thought of, but other cases in Magia Record just reuse the original Witch's design and that's a bummer _ _". About the Magical Girls' Souls, honestly Ive thought about this too... I prefer to think that its still there, but maybe its permamently damaged/bound, in a way that doesn't let them move on? Like Homulilly, she forever tries to reach a guillotine but she never will, implying that she can't really evolve any further, that's what I mean by being "bound". This would also explain why a Witch cant turn back into a Magical Girl, because while Hope can transform into Despair, Despair cant turn into Hope. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I doubt the soul is still whole. When we see Sayaka Soul gem turn grief seed, we see the outer shell breaks and the grief seed inside is already manifesting.
So the hypothesis is this. The impurities are coagulating into the grief seed and when it's too much to bear, the soul sheds parts of itself. The gem breaks, part of the girl's soul and very identity is gone.
Perhaps it's caught by Kyubey in the process and converted into energy. Perhaps it just dissipates. The witch is what remains. The witch is not the girl anymore. It's a remnant of who she was. Like a series of memories but incomplete. Like a fever dream or nightmare.
The evidence is how Oktavia still had a vague Sayaka shape, but it was melting. Homura is the outlier because her soul gem never broke, so she never went into a real witch.
If Hope can turn into Despair, Despair can also turn into hope. But Witches are different because of the soul being an actual thing that can be damaged and destroyed. Not so sure on doppels, but they break the rules anyways. [[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]]) 18:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

==Observations==
Please stop removing the observations for characters? I'm grateful you're working on the new info boxes but the observations of traits and analysis are important to analysis of the setting? [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 20:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
: I just think they're quite useless, yeah they're analyses of behaviour, but a lot of it just seems like thoughts that just don't fit on a wiki, more fitting on a personal page. Plus a lot of stuff there would be better off in other sections, such as behaviour in the Personality section, and stuff about design in the Appearance section. I just don't like those sections for how much they feel like they don't fit into a wiki. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 08:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
:: Okay, sure, some of it is better fit for trivia... but that isn't what you're doing. It *is* scholarly analysis. traditional wikis do not do such a thing, but THIS WIKI has a decade plus history of doing so. As such.... Either leaving it, or labeling it similarly to how the Speculation blocks are done that "this isn't fact but is important." is important in my mind. Some of the items I would never have made the connections to otherwise. (For example: Quitterie); Not all of the items in Observations can uniformly be moved into Appearances or Personality. Please. [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 15:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
::: I mean if you care about them that much, then I'm sure there are others too. I will bring them back, but I still plan on cutting some of the points out, like for Kazumi I dont think there's a point in keeping these:
:::* In Chapter 20, it is stated that Kazumi's cooking is good, just like Michiru, making them closer to their goal of bringing back their Michiru.
:::* Like [[Madoka Kaname|Madoka]], both are friendly, gentle and they want to be helpful to other people, and they were both initially average magical girls who died and became "special" as a result of their friends' actions.
:::That's the main reason I deleted them, but fine I'll bring them all back, then I'll start cutting down stuff I think is unnecesary. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
:::: That would be fine by me. Fluff observations can go, but scholarly, literary, or analytical comparisons, esp. if backed up by staff and/or interviews, should stay in my mind. Thank you. I'll work on some of them later if I have the time. Been very busy as of late... [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 16:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

== About the images used by the Magia Record Stats template ==

If I didn’t miss anything, I think I’ve finally renamed all of the Magia Record card images to the Card_(id)_c.png format. I also changed the Magia Record Stats template so that it generates the image filename directly from the ID, and fixed all the pages that were still linking to the old/wrong filenames... 😭

There is one small issue, though: Darc (Final)’s 5★ card image (Card_40285_c.png) is the version with the frame, while the frameless version comes from Magia Exedra and is currently uploaded as Card_40285_c (Exedra).png.

So I’m wondering which would be better: Keep a little flexibility in the template, so that if an image filename is specified manually, it uses that instead of generating one from the ID; or Just keep things simple and replace Card_40285_c.png with the frameless Exedra version?

Also, I noticed that in Magia Exedra’s Archive, Lil' Kyubey’s card image actually includes the character name. Should we consider switching to that version, or should we keep using the current version without the character name? -- [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 18:27, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

<gallery>
File:Card 40285 c.png|Magia Record version
File:Card 40285 c (Exedra).png|Magia Exedra (frameless) version
File:Card 10424 c.png|Lil' Kyubey (no character name)
</gallery>
:Thank you ^^, I think uploading the frameless version as the main one is the better option, and for Lil' Kyubey I think the Exedra versions could be better? I'm not sure though, as the nameless one would be more accurate to Record. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:32, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
::For Lil' Kyuubey I think it makes sense to keep both, as the nameless one is a better fit for the unit page, but the named one could be added to the Exedra gallery. No idea on Darc. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 05:48, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

:::Okay I uploaded the frameless Final Darc card as a new version of the old one, it should be fine to delete [[:File:Card 40285 c (Exedra).png]]? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 13:39, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
:::: If the frameless version is going to replace Card_40285_c.png, then I think it should be fine to delete Card_40285_c (Exedra).png as well.
:::: Also, I noticed that Ashley's skill set differs quite a bit between the JP and NA servers. Should we consider creating a separate unit entry for the NA version of Ashley? For now, I've put the differences in her skill set on [[User:Hilbert88#Ashley|my user page]]. --[[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 17:29, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

::::: I'm worried that it would be annoying to separate them, a lot of things would just be repeated, like the Doppel description and Side Story, I mean I did want to change where they are placed on the wiki but right now they're on the unit pages so... Also separating the JP and NA means all the japanese wouldn't be on the NA page, and would that mean english shouldnt be on the JP page? I feel like it creates problems and we should try to fuse them instead (Im pretty sure Mami also has a tiny NA difference? I remember it from creating the unit pages) - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

:::::: Looking at the differences, they seem to almost all be of the "rebalancing" category and not a fundamental difference in her powerset. (After all, Charm and Bewitch are the same thing, right?) I guess "Guaranteed Ignore Damage Cut" and "Blast MP Gain UP" are new, though. I think I'd prioritize showing the JP skill set, as it can be seen as an evolution from the NA skill set. Since neither game is still up and playable, it doesn't seem worth recording the differences in her NA stats as a separate unit page, though if you really want to do so, I don't mind. (But you could also just add the same table from your user page on the JP unit page.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

== Regarding Mobage/Online ==

I wonder, why do you think Exedra adapting Mobage/Online is so unlikely that they would be less likely than Null? Null is insanely weird and unusual for PMMM and the 3rd chapter especially is a complete mindfuck. Even I'm not 100% sure what's going on.

Just curious. I really liked reading through your user page.
:As weird as Null Magical Girl is, I think just because its recent it has a bigger chance. To be fair, both Null and Mobage haven't been referenced in any other media so they do kinda have the same chances, but still, I think just because Null is more recent, it has a bigger chance. ALSO another thing that kinda makes me believe Mobage won't ever see the light of day is that every single character design idea they used for the 4 Mobage girls has been reused I mean...
<gallery mode=nolines>
File:Mobage7060.jpg
File:Exedra Live2D 835930.png
File:Mobage7059.jpg
File:Umika PM.png
File:Mobage7058.jpg
File:Alexandra Website.png
File:Mobage7057.jpg
File:Meiyui PM.png
</gallery>

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 09:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
:So as much as I want to see them I believe its very unlikely T-T. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 09:21, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!

I think that's ''kind of'' a stretch.

Sasa Yuuki isn't even from Record (from Oriko) and mostly just shares the fact that they have a Jester Theme. Alexandra is the only one I think actually looks like a reused design. Meiyui doesn't even use the same weapon.

---

Plus in Null, there's literally ''one'' actual Magical girl and it's not like her design is super great. https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Coeurl

Kyubey-Kosane doesn't really make sense as a unit unless they start adding non-magical girl units.

I guess Homo Magica, even though they are debatably magical girls? I kind of want to see them expanded on. Them interfering with the Lighthouse might be an interesting way to introduce them.

They screwed a lot with the time-stream/different universes in the source material.

---

But yeah in both cases, Exedra is unlikely to get to them until many more years into its life.

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 09:30, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

: You could maybe argue that Coeurl is not powered up in that shot, meaning we've never seen her magical girl outfit. (I don't remember if the novel contradicts this theory.) In any case, I wouldn't really like it if NMG was brought up in Exedra. It's just a bit too weird. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:48, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 06:01, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Ironically I'm kind of the opposite and love it and want to see an expansion of the world (like hard sci-fi like this). But get it- it's divisive for a reason.

Crazy how it's ''technically'' the only spinoff since the end of Tart and the start of Record/Exedra.

== Question. ==

What's 2↑↑5? [[User:Belankt294842|Belankt294842]] ([[User talk:Belankt294842|talk]]) 00:24, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

User talk:TheresaFrog421

2026-08-25T00:35:05Z

Belankt294842: /* Question. */

== Interacting with bots ==

Hello! I wanted to inform you that the user you interacted with "What" to was a bot. In the future, I would recommend not interacting with them and to let moderators handle it. Have a good day. [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 14:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

== Kuro ==

Just letting you know, but くろ and 黒 are not their last names – both are different ways of writing "kuro" in Japanese, so it's just a difference in spelling. Do you still think it's worth including that information on [[Kuro|this page]]? (I'm not trying to say it's not worth it; I'm letting you decide.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 06:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
:Honestly yeah, I know there's the little description next to their name but if Magireco added the くろ and 黒 as a way of differentiating them, I don't see why the kuro page shouldn't, and it helps me identify them quicker. (Also i got the idea of it being a last name because of [[Kuro (くろ)|Kuro's (くろ)]] etymology section where it calls it that) --[[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 10:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
::I mean, sure, it is technically their last name. "Kuro" is presumed to be their surname, not their given name. But your phrasing seemed to imply you were thinking of "Kuro" as the first name and the Japanese characters as the surname, which is not the case. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 14:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

== Deletion requests ==

Please don't blank the page when requesting for it to be deleted. Just add the deletion requests category. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 15:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:If you're talking about ''Magia Exedra Story Transcripts/Magia Record Main Story - Rumor of the Anonymous AI/Portrait Story'' then I wasn't the one who deleted the content, it was EPF (they created and edited the page so I can't blame them) I only added the deletion request category (I guess I can't prove it since the page is gone). The only proof are [[Puella Magi Madoka Magica Portable & Mami's Heart-Pounding Tiro Finale Grief Seeds]] and [[Minor Oriko Witches]] still having their content (I "moved" them to [[Madoka Magica Grief Seeds]] and [[Oriko Magica Witches]] respectively) - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

== Memory Windows ==

It seems you missed the Symbol Witch and the Mirror Witch? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 21:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:Yeah I'm not the one who extracted them out of the files so I can't really find them on my own. I was hoping to get them through EPF's google drive but it seems like theyre not updating it currently so I got them from the Exedra wiki. They dont have the symbol, mirror and two forms of stagecraft window. I'm REALLY not good with any file extracting so I'm sorry that I can't look for them myself. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 22:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
::Okay, that's fair. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

== Rumor of Walpurgisnacht ==

<blockquote>"I need help, I wanted to change the walpurgisnacht rumor to the eng dub one but I genuinely CANNOT hear what uwasasan is saying in some parts T_T"</blockquote>
Are you not using closed captions (cc)? It should help you. ~ [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 00:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
:The only ones I can use are the translated ones, when I want to upload the official english rumor. If you or anyone else has the real english cc it would help T_T. --[[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 07:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

== Gallery moves!? ==

Wait, why are all the gallery pages being moved? We already went to the trouble of making Gallery: be a proper namespace. What's the problem with having the galleries in their own namespace? Is there some reason why they absolutely have to be subpages? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 04:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
:At first I saw Amaterasu doing it, and since I was changing [[Template:Navbox Anime Gallery]] I decided to just go with it and start moving them. Tbh I shouldn't bring Amaterasu into this but since they're way longer on this wiki and their changes were just left unquestioned I assumed everyone was okay with them, and I wanted to help ཀ ʖ̯ ཀ. I can still change them back even if it takes time but please while you're here delete the redirects I put in [[:Category:Deletion requests|deletion requests]], they're extremely unnecessary. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
::The use of subpages is more efficient, in my view. It allows you to quickly link back to the main page, and I think it's better than simply using "Gallery:", since it also makes it clear that it isn't a new page, simply a part of the page. I probably didn't explain this well, I just woke up. ~ [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 12:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:::Yeah, I agree with gallery subpages too. Another bonus is searchability - you have to preface everything with Gallery: if you wanna search for pages in that namespace, they don't appear otherwise. Which kinda sucks. However I'm also pretty sure we're using some cursed old search extension. [[User:EPF|EPF]] ([[User talk:EPF|talk]]) 17:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

::::Though, you could also argue that not appearing in searches is a ''good'' thing. Someone searching is more likely to want the article than the gallery. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 00:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

== CSS ==

Regarding [https://wiki.puella-magi.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Witch_Card&diff=next&oldid=193460 this edit]: I'm not sure what you were going for, but you misspelled "margin-top". It has a hyphen in it, not an underscore. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:27, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
:Tried checking it again and it still doesn't work, on some pages the name box appears on the same position as the witch display but on others (like [[Minor Magia Record Witches and Doppels]]) its a little bit lower, it might be some other part of the code though. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 09:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

== Tabbers ==

I noticed you're experimenting with the new <nowiki><tabber></nowiki> tag that was recently installed. Please be sure to watch out for pages that link to specific tabs, as the fragment (the part after <code>#</code>) completely changes with the new system. So, just changing a page to use the new tabs instead of the old potentially breaks links silently with no warning at all. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 04:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
:Okay, I'll check if the Iroha edit I made broke any links, for now Im focusing on making empty Exedra Event pages but I'll remember it - thanks! - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 04:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

== Star ==

Why are you changing the star? The memoria cards clearly use eight-pointed stars, not five-pointed stars. That's why I used an eight-pointed star in the category names. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]])
:On my laptop the star was a blank box (🟎) Idk if Safari doesnt understand that symbol but it just looked broken. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:01, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
:I checked and it just doesn't work on Safari, even if its made with html (🟎). Ive found ones that work, ✵ and ✴ (there are other eight-pointed stars but only these are rotated correctly), I prefer the first one. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:20, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
::So basically it's an issue of you don't have a font with that character. Of the two stars you found that ''do'' work though, I think the second is actually more suitable. The first is "eight-pointed pinwheel star", and it's not solid black unlike the other two. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:59, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

== Enemy elements ==

Do you have a specific order that you think the elements should be shown in for the "enemies" section on the memory window pages? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:18, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:They appear in that order in the suggested element section before a fight and the fight itself. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:22, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::So you haven't really checked if the order is always the same then. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::I mean?? I never saw them appear in any other order, so I do just assume that it stays the same. If that's not the case then yeah it should be changed. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::I looked through them a bit. It looks like the game is always listing them in the same order that they appear in the upgrade/crystalis quest lists. At least, I didn't see any that contradicted that order. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:39, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::Okay that's good, also while you're here what do we do with the Scene 0 enemies? From what I got its a lot of enemies from other quests, but Im worried its gonna be almost too many of them. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::I guess the first step would be collating an actual list of the enemies used in Scene 0. Only then can we decide whether it seems like "too many". ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 21:13, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I watched someone play the standard version and this is the list, but I'm pretty sure on Battler and Nightmare there are more unique enemies. Also they all have Aqua Forest and Light weaknesses. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 21:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::#Gertrud
::::::#Anthony
::::::#Adelbert
::::::#Ulla
::::::#Charlotte
::::::#Pyotr
::::::#H.N. Elly
::::::#Danniyel & Jennifer
::::::#Anja
::::::#Elsa Maria
::::::#Sebastian's
::::::#Bartels
::::::#Oktavia
::::::#Patricia
::::::#Roberta

== Ponta ==

Thank you! You totally anticipated what I was about to ask for with that gallery edit. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 19:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

==Full Photos==

May I ask where the recent Full photos came from? I really want to see if there's other ones, especially of ones I like :) I'm referring to these (Sayaka Kimono Full 2.png, Sayaka Kimono Full.png, Ren Christmas Full.png, Rika Christmas Full.png, Shizuka First Sunrise Full.png) ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 20:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
:The "Event Files" I mention in the upload summaries are specifically in [https://pi.rika.ren/magica/resource/image_native/effect/story/ this folder of the Magireco File Archive]. Sadly, there's not a lot of these full renders. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
:: Thank you.. (╥﹏╥) ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 06:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

== Templates category ==

Is there any actual point in [[:Category:Templates]]? If you need a list of all templates on the wiki, [[Special:AllPages]] is clearly better (no need to manually categorize them all). Other template categories are fine, but I don't see the point of that one. (Maybe there ''is'' a point I'm missing? I don't know.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 02:36, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
: Yeah its not ''that'' needed, but I do think it's a bit nicer than [[Special:AllPages]] just because of how Category pages look. I don't see it as redundant, just a tiny bit better alternative (Even if it is kinda annoying to categorize them manually). - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

== Edit Summary ==

It would help a lot if you remembered to fill in the edit summary when you edit. We wouldn't have had to have the recent double revert if the original edi summary had explained why you removed that link, for example. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:33, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
:Yeah I sometimes just think its obvious enough what the edit is for, sorry. Then again please check what the edit actually did before reverting it, cause it was pretty obvious that it linked to the wrong image. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:02, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
::I did. The two images were similar enough that linking them was plausible, so it wasn't as obvious as you thought. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 12:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

== Inline Icon ==

It feels like your use of Inline Icon on the enemy info pages doesn't really fit. It's meant for embedding an icon into the flow of text, but that's not what you're doing there. Is there any reason you can't just drop the icon image in directly like <nowiki>[[Image.png|link=Magia Record Items]]</nowiki>? ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:48, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
: Changed. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
: Oh yeah, does [[Magia Record Enemy - Symbol Witch Minion IV (Haunting Chairs)|Echo IV]] have any drop items? It seems like it should, but I cant find what it would be. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 06:07, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
:: Sorry, I have no idea. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 12:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

== Progress Reports ==
I'm not good with css, or templates, but I was thinking if we could make a template similar to the progress report at the bottom of [[Timeline]]? I was thinking a way to just list the entries as integrated/finished and non-finished and then have the progress bar automatically update. Perhaps even only using parts of them in the articles they belong (like the Timeline for Null only has the progress report for Null) but Timeline has all of them (as well as additional lists for Retellings and Unknown Placement). I can make the lists and fill them in, but I wondered if it would be possible to make that asset as a template that can be edited, so that it can be universal across pages that use it. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 16:04, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:What exactly do you mean by "automatically update"? It's a bit vague, and sounds like it could be quite tricky. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 16:07, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:: I mean the progress bar automatically updates in accordance to what is finised and what is not finished. (Like if the finished list has three elements and the unfinished has two, the progress bar would automatically just calculate to 60%). To also explain the example with Null that I brought up: the template, when its used on pages, can just be edited to which parts are visible and which aren't. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 16:10, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

: I think maybe with [[Module:ArrayParameter]] it could be possible? To list something you would have to put it in a new parameter, and im pretty sure Array Parameter can count how many parameters there are (if done right obv). Then just do some math to show how much is done in %. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::So basically you're saying that completion percentage would be based on comparing a "target list" with a "completed list"? It sounds doable, but probably not easy, and likely requires a module to do properly. (Not [[Module:ArrayParameter]], but a dedicated module just for this purpose.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 16:15, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::: It works right now but is kinda annoying when trying to change not done stuff to done (cause you have to change a lot of numbers). I still dont think its worth its own module, but maybe theres some way to make it count the <code>*</code>s in a parameter and then calculate the progress bar with that? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 00:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

::: You can see my example at [[User:TheresaFrog421/Sandbox#Template]], its messy and looks bad but what counts is that it works. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:27, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:::: Okay I improved it to look like it does on [[Timeline]] (not 1:1 but thats not possible). - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:13, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::::: Oh that's perfect! Can we make it so that it's usable for the files? Or at least for [[Timeline]]? I can then populate each entry for each timeline, as well as the Retellings and Unknown Placement like before. ~ [[User:Sweet Beanie|Sweet Beanie]] ([[User talk:Sweet Beanie|talk]]) 17:48, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:::::: What do you mean by "files"? The Wishlist? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 17:52, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

: I do think it's worth its own module. Then you could write it like this:
<pre>{{Progress
|done1=thing
|done2=thing
|notdone3=thing
|done4=thing
|done5=thing
|notdone6=thing
}}</pre>
: The key point there being that done and not done elements share the same numerical sequence, so marking something done is just a matter of deleting "not". ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 00:51, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:: That would already be nicer than the current setup but if the module could just count the amount of bulleted point items it would be even easier, it would look like this:
<pre>{{Progress
|done=
* Thing
* Thing
* Thing
|notdone=
* Thing
}}</pre>
:: I'm not sure just how much a module can actually do so.. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 00:57, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::It can do pretty much anything, so counting the *'s is certainly possible. I'm not too happy with that idea though. If it's expected to ''always'' be a straight bulleted list without any tree structures, then I think it makes more sense for those *'s to be in the template instead of in the page; whereas if there's any tree structures, or any situation where it wouldn't be a bulleted list, then counting the *'s gives the wrong answer. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:38, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: I mean yeah but in both scenarios its a bulleted list, I dont really know what other lists it could be, at most one where #s are used, or a tree list, but in both scenarios those can be easily managed no? I mean the #s can be counted with the *s and for a tree structure, if a <code>:*</code> is used instead of <code>**</code>, it shouldn't change anything. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 02:14, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::: Still, with your method, the edit to mark something done will show as deleting it from "not done" and adding it to "done", whereas with my method it will show as "changing it from not done to done". It might not make much difference if only one or two are marked done, but if you mark several done all at once I think it would look messier with your method. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:51, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::: I think it all depends on how it will look on the page itself really, right now the done and not done are fully separated, which my idea would fit better. But if it looked like:

'''Madoka Magica'''
* Episode 1 (Done)
* Episode 2 (Done)
* Episode 3 (Not done)
* Episode 4 (Not done)
* Episode 5 (Done)
* Episode 6 (Not done)

::::::Then yeah your idea would fit better. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:00, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::Even then I think it would be better if the module just counted the ammount of "(Done)"s and "(Not done)"s. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 12:52, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

== Enemies ==

I added the enemy list for Please Yuna-san, but I ran into one issue. Sakuya, Ranka, Ao, and Hikaru appear as regular enemies in Waves 1–4 of the Hundred Evils Challenge stage, but they also appear as bosses in Wave 5. In this case, should they be split into separate Boss and non-Boss entries? - [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 20:24, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
: Yeah then both should be listed. Also do you have a good source of what enemies appear in what events? I [[User:TheresaFrog421#Enemies to confirm|have a whole list of pages that have missing enemies]] and I predict it will only get bigger. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 20:28, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:: [https://magireco.moe/] should have information for most Challenge, EX Challenge, and Hundred Evils Challenge stages. However, the site is in Chinese, so it may take some time to translate the information. Also, it seems that the site is no longer being actively maintained, so it may be unstable and sometimes inaccessible. - [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 20:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:: Also, it seems that the Magical Halloween Theater event was held in a PvP format at the time, so the event itself does not have any enemies. -[[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 21:04, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

== Reverting Official But Wrong Translations ==

I can understand wanting to keep the "official" translations but when they're done poorly and incorrect more often than not, we probably want to keep better translations *somewhere*. In the case of Paola there's specifically items missing from the official translation present in the original JP text... that's kinda significant. [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 21:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
:The nature is missing from the official translation right? Yeah its pretty significant, but I still prefer sticking to the official descriptions. I can get behind putting it in the trivia that the nature is missing from the english text, but outright replacing the official translation is wrong. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 07:04, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

== User reaching out ==

You like witches? I like witches. Let's talk witches? But where, and how? (excuse me if I mucked up the editing, its been many years.)
[[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]]) 23:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

:I don't really know what you mean, but I'm up for discussion ^^. And it would be best just here. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 11:58, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

What do you like most about the witches? Your profile implies you do, since a section asks for more witch content. I also wish more witch lore. Like for example how exactly familiars grow into witches, we are told little about it.
Or how much of the magical girl's soul is 'lost' when turning into a grief seed. It looks to me like the main personality is shed and only the subconscious ego remains as a witch.
You can check my profile for some of my old contributions [[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]])

I honestly like everything, but if I HAD to choose its probably the striking difference between a Magical Girl and a Witch, I mean Sayaka has only 3 colors in her outfit but Oktavia has so many, to me it feels like what the person looks if they werent bound by a human body. About the familiars, I wish we got more proof of familiars growing into Witches ''and being diffrent''. Im pretty sure Sarah Mirabilis W confirms that its been thought of, but other cases in Magia Record just reuse the original Witch's design and that's a bummer _ _". About the Magical Girls' Souls, honestly Ive thought about this too... I prefer to think that its still there, but maybe its permamently damaged/bound, in a way that doesn't let them move on? Like Homulilly, she forever tries to reach a guillotine but she never will, implying that she can't really evolve any further, that's what I mean by being "bound". This would also explain why a Witch cant turn back into a Magical Girl, because while Hope can transform into Despair, Despair cant turn into Hope. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I doubt the soul is still whole. When we see Sayaka Soul gem turn grief seed, we see the outer shell breaks and the grief seed inside is already manifesting.
So the hypothesis is this. The impurities are coagulating into the grief seed and when it's too much to bear, the soul sheds parts of itself. The gem breaks, part of the girl's soul and very identity is gone.
Perhaps it's caught by Kyubey in the process and converted into energy. Perhaps it just dissipates. The witch is what remains. The witch is not the girl anymore. It's a remnant of who she was. Like a series of memories but incomplete. Like a fever dream or nightmare.
The evidence is how Oktavia still had a vague Sayaka shape, but it was melting. Homura is the outlier because her soul gem never broke, so she never went into a real witch.
If Hope can turn into Despair, Despair can also turn into hope. But Witches are different because of the soul being an actual thing that can be damaged and destroyed. Not so sure on doppels, but they break the rules anyways. [[User:Miho Yamamura|Miho Yamamura]] ([[User talk:Miho Yamamura|talk]]) 18:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

==Observations==
Please stop removing the observations for characters? I'm grateful you're working on the new info boxes but the observations of traits and analysis are important to analysis of the setting? [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 20:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
: I just think they're quite useless, yeah they're analyses of behaviour, but a lot of it just seems like thoughts that just don't fit on a wiki, more fitting on a personal page. Plus a lot of stuff there would be better off in other sections, such as behaviour in the Personality section, and stuff about design in the Appearance section. I just don't like those sections for how much they feel like they don't fit into a wiki. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 08:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
:: Okay, sure, some of it is better fit for trivia... but that isn't what you're doing. It *is* scholarly analysis. traditional wikis do not do such a thing, but THIS WIKI has a decade plus history of doing so. As such.... Either leaving it, or labeling it similarly to how the Speculation blocks are done that "this isn't fact but is important." is important in my mind. Some of the items I would never have made the connections to otherwise. (For example: Quitterie); Not all of the items in Observations can uniformly be moved into Appearances or Personality. Please. [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 15:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
::: I mean if you care about them that much, then I'm sure there are others too. I will bring them back, but I still plan on cutting some of the points out, like for Kazumi I dont think there's a point in keeping these:
:::* In Chapter 20, it is stated that Kazumi's cooking is good, just like Michiru, making them closer to their goal of bringing back their Michiru.
:::* Like [[Madoka Kaname|Madoka]], both are friendly, gentle and they want to be helpful to other people, and they were both initially average magical girls who died and became "special" as a result of their friends' actions.
:::That's the main reason I deleted them, but fine I'll bring them all back, then I'll start cutting down stuff I think is unnecesary. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 16:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
:::: That would be fine by me. Fluff observations can go, but scholarly, literary, or analytical comparisons, esp. if backed up by staff and/or interviews, should stay in my mind. Thank you. I'll work on some of them later if I have the time. Been very busy as of late... [[User:HomuraDidNothingWrong|HomuraDidNothingWrong]] ([[User talk:HomuraDidNothingWrong|talk]]) 16:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

== About the images used by the Magia Record Stats template ==

If I didn’t miss anything, I think I’ve finally renamed all of the Magia Record card images to the Card_(id)_c.png format. I also changed the Magia Record Stats template so that it generates the image filename directly from the ID, and fixed all the pages that were still linking to the old/wrong filenames... 😭

There is one small issue, though: Darc (Final)’s 5★ card image (Card_40285_c.png) is the version with the frame, while the frameless version comes from Magia Exedra and is currently uploaded as Card_40285_c (Exedra).png.

So I’m wondering which would be better: Keep a little flexibility in the template, so that if an image filename is specified manually, it uses that instead of generating one from the ID; or Just keep things simple and replace Card_40285_c.png with the frameless Exedra version?

Also, I noticed that in Magia Exedra’s Archive, Lil' Kyubey’s card image actually includes the character name. Should we consider switching to that version, or should we keep using the current version without the character name? -- [[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 18:27, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

<gallery>
File:Card 40285 c.png|Magia Record version
File:Card 40285 c (Exedra).png|Magia Exedra (frameless) version
File:Card 10424 c.png|Lil' Kyubey (no character name)
</gallery>
:Thank you ^^, I think uploading the frameless version as the main one is the better option, and for Lil' Kyubey I think the Exedra versions could be better? I'm not sure though, as the nameless one would be more accurate to Record. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:32, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
::For Lil' Kyuubey I think it makes sense to keep both, as the nameless one is a better fit for the unit page, but the named one could be added to the Exedra gallery. No idea on Darc. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 05:48, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

:::Okay I uploaded the frameless Final Darc card as a new version of the old one, it should be fine to delete [[:File:Card 40285 c (Exedra).png]]? - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 13:39, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
:::: If the frameless version is going to replace Card_40285_c.png, then I think it should be fine to delete Card_40285_c (Exedra).png as well.
:::: Also, I noticed that Ashley's skill set differs quite a bit between the JP and NA servers. Should we consider creating a separate unit entry for the NA version of Ashley? For now, I've put the differences in her skill set on [[User:Hilbert88#Ashley|my user page]]. --[[User:Hilbert88|Hilbert88]] ([[User talk:Hilbert88|talk]]) 17:29, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

::::: I'm worried that it would be annoying to separate them, a lot of things would just be repeated, like the Doppel description and Side Story, I mean I did want to change where they are placed on the wiki but right now they're on the unit pages so... Also separating the JP and NA means all the japanese wouldn't be on the NA page, and would that mean english shouldnt be on the JP page? I feel like it creates problems and we should try to fuse them instead (Im pretty sure Mami also has a tiny NA difference? I remember it from creating the unit pages) - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 18:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

:::::: Looking at the differences, they seem to almost all be of the "rebalancing" category and not a fundamental difference in her powerset. (After all, Charm and Bewitch are the same thing, right?) I guess "Guaranteed Ignore Damage Cut" and "Blast MP Gain UP" are new, though. I think I'd prioritize showing the JP skill set, as it can be seen as an evolution from the NA skill set. Since neither game is still up and playable, it doesn't seem worth recording the differences in her NA stats as a separate unit page, though if you really want to do so, I don't mind. (But you could also just add the same table from your user page on the JP unit page.) ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

== Regarding Mobage/Online ==

I wonder, why do you think Exedra adapting Mobage/Online is so unlikely that they would be less likely than Null? Null is insanely weird and unusual for PMMM and the 3rd chapter especially is a complete mindfuck. Even I'm not 100% sure what's going on.

Just curious. I really liked reading through your user page.
:As weird as Null Magical Girl is, I think just because its recent it has a bigger chance. To be fair, both Null and Mobage haven't been referenced in any other media so they do kinda have the same chances, but still, I think just because Null is more recent, it has a bigger chance. ALSO another thing that kinda makes me believe Mobage won't ever see the light of day is that every single character design idea they used for the 4 Mobage girls has been reused I mean...
<gallery mode=nolines>
File:Mobage7060.jpg
File:Exedra Live2D 835930.png
File:Mobage7059.jpg
File:Umika PM.png
File:Mobage7058.jpg
File:Alexandra Website.png
File:Mobage7057.jpg
File:Meiyui PM.png
</gallery>

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 09:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
:So as much as I want to see them I believe its very unlikely T-T. - [[User:TheresaFrog421|TheresaFrog421]] ([[User talk:TheresaFrog421|talk]]) 09:21, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!

I think that's ''kind of'' a stretch.

Sasa Yuuki isn't even from Record (from Oriko) and mostly just shares the fact that they have a Jester Theme. Alexandra is the only one I think actually looks like a reused design. Meiyui doesn't even use the same weapon.

---

Plus in Null, there's literally ''one'' actual Magical girl and it's not like her design is super great. https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Coeurl

Kyubey-Kosane doesn't really make sense as a unit unless they start adding non-magical girl units.

I guess Homo Magica, even though they are debatably magical girls? I kind of want to see them expanded on. Them interfering with the Lighthouse might be an interesting way to introduce them.

They screwed a lot with the time-stream/different universes in the source material.

---

But yeah in both cases, Exedra is unlikely to get to them until many more years into its life.

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 09:30, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

: You could maybe argue that Coeurl is not powered up in that shot, meaning we've never seen her magical girl outfit. (I don't remember if the novel contradicts this theory.) In any case, I wouldn't really like it if NMG was brought up in Exedra. It's just a bit too weird. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 01:48, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

--[[User:Fredinno|Fredinno]] ([[User talk:Fredinno|talk]]) 06:01, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Ironically I'm kind of the opposite and love it and want to see an expansion of the world (like hard sci-fi like this). But get it- it's divisive for a reason.

Crazy how it's ''technically'' the only spinoff since the end of Tart and the start of Record/Exedra.

== Question. ==

What's 2↑↑5? The answer needs to be in Scientific Notation. [[User:Belankt294842|Belankt294842]] ([[User talk:Belankt294842|talk]]) 00:24, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

User talk:TheresaFrog421

2026-08-25T00:24:51Z

Belankt294842: /* Question. */ new section