MediaWiki talk:Sidebar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BrickBreak (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The sidebar seems to act somewhat weird. From time to time, it just shows as the default version (with no useful links whatsoever), and stays like that for a couple of minutes or so, even though [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] itself looks perfectly fine. That's probably some weird MediaWiki bug, but I thought I'd make you guys aware of that, in case you haven't already noticed. --[[User:KFYatek|KFYatek]] 14:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | The sidebar seems to act somewhat weird. From time to time, it just shows as the default version (with no useful links whatsoever), and stays like that for a couple of minutes or so, even though [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]] itself looks perfectly fine. That's probably some weird MediaWiki bug (or maybe the database got desynchronized or corrupted?), but I thought I'd make you guys aware of that, in case you haven't already noticed. --[[User:KFYatek|KFYatek]] 14:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I noticed that as well, but I thought it was page and not time-based. Than again, that'd probably be even more awkward... --[[User:BrickBreak|BrickBreak]] 14:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | :I noticed that as well, but I thought it was page and not time-based. Than again, that'd probably be even more awkward... --[[User:BrickBreak|BrickBreak]] 14:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 8 May 2011
The sidebar seems to act somewhat weird. From time to time, it just shows as the default version (with no useful links whatsoever), and stays like that for a couple of minutes or so, even though MediaWiki:Sidebar itself looks perfectly fine. That's probably some weird MediaWiki bug (or maybe the database got desynchronized or corrupted?), but I thought I'd make you guys aware of that, in case you haven't already noticed. --KFYatek 14:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- I noticed that as well, but I thought it was page and not time-based. Than again, that'd probably be even more awkward... --BrickBreak 14:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)