Talk:Kazumi

From Puella Magi Wiki
Revision as of 22:09, 6 May 2011 by BrickBreak (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Just a small question here: is it acceptable to upload manga panels? --BrickBreak 17:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC) :We don't have a clear copyright policy anywhere, or...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Note: Please always sign your name when editing talk page by putting four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment.

Just a small question here: is it acceptable to upload manga panels? --BrickBreak 17:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

We don't have a clear copyright policy anywhere, or at least I haven't found one anywhere (I actually tried talking about that but it went unanswered). Some scans of the manga are already uploaded (manga versions of Charlotte and Elsa Maria, "Incubator" scene, etc.), though, so by precedent, I'd say yes. --KFYatek 18:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Man, this page seems more complete than those about main characters! Maybe you should consider refactoring the main character pages? You seem the right man to do it (įŽ‘) --KFYatek 21:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Maybe, but... I'm short on time, at the moment, I have the weekend and little more (fencing tourney next week). I'll give it a try, but I reckon it's easier when you have a couple of paragraphs as base material and you add your own (most of this article was written by hand while I was bored in class today :P), than when you have... well, no one would be offended if I called that a clusterfuck, uh?
Anyway, while the rest may have worked (and props to whoever suggested these guidelines in the KazuMagi talk page, wasn't signed), I failed in the history section. I wasn't able to synthesize things well, got two huge paragraphs off a single chapter. I think that's the only thing left to move this to the main namespace. --BrickBreak 21:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Looks cleaner than the other character pages indeed (I haven't read it yet so I can't judge the content though). I think you should move it to the main namespace, that way other people will be more inclined to edit it as well (it's, well, more intimidating when it's in someone's namespace). Might not be perfect yet, but it's also what a wiki is for right? If you don't know how to synthetize the history section, just leave it in the main namespace and watch the wiki magic in action... --Homerun-chan 21:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

'Speculah' or 'Speculation' (... or 'Speculations'?)

Continuing the discussion that started in the edit notes:

(me --Homerun-chan-- changing "Speculah" into "Speculation"): Just nitpicking here; "Speculah" is Internet slang and shouldn't be used on a "serious" page ...
(Brickbreak): I could have absolutely sworn the other character pages had "speculah" instead of "speculation". Then again, that's just going from memory, and it's not like I've slept for... the whole week, i think?
(ma again): Well there was "speculah" here and there back in the day, but it got edited for the same reason (unless we missed some pages). Might still be present on some less formal pages (threads history, etc).
Speaking of which, I'm hesitating now: is it "Speculation" or "Speculations"? (I mean, can it be plural? I know "information" is always singular in english, for instance ...) --if we're gonna make it into meme-free English, let's make it into grammatically correct English too! --Homerun-chan 22:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)