Template talk:Fanart

Is it really needed to have this disclaimer? I mean, the sections are called fanart, so I suppose people can guess it's fan-created and non-canon ... --Homerun-chan 09:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I hope you're aware of what randomanon said in Talk:Guidelines about people getting confused by fanart images. The disclaimers were originally added by Mutopis as plain text, separately on every page, so I made a template, just to organize things a bit. Personally, I don't see much sense in putting a fanart disclaimer in "fanart" section, too... --kFYatek 10:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't see the discussion was already going on there (it probably got swamped in the other revision notes or something). I'll go and continue there then --Homerun-chan 10:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

How do I put this delicately, we all know the difference between official and fanart, unfortunately some people need a big sign that says Stop before they drive through a crossroads. I know it sounds patronizing but just to avoid confusion on the part of visitors who are knew or maybe unaware they may require such a sign, but that is just my opinion. --Mutopis 10:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually I like your road signs metaphor because it shows pretty well the problems I see with the disclaimers. There are speed limits, stop signs, traffic lights, directions signs and so on, and in big cities it turns into a forest of signs everywhere. And yet, tourists get lost, people get speed tickets or run the lights. In the same fashion, we can put as many disclaimers as we want (see the Episode 12 page: it has a spoiler box, a speculah alert and two fanart disclaimers, plus inline spoilers), yet people will still misunderstand if they don't pay any attention.
Also, a stop sign reads "Stop", it doesn't read "This is a dangerous crossroad. Drivers may want to slow down or let other cars go first". Again, I think the "Fanart" headline is enough, or if we really wanna emphasize the fact that fanarts aren't canon, a small plain-text paragraph would do just fine. (same goes with the speculah alert btw, I'll try and make a less flashy way of tagging speculah when I have the time). I may be wrong though, and there might be a way to compromise by just making the alert less flashy or something ... --Homerun-chan 11:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Come to think of it, why not just edit this so that it can be used with speculah too? So basically, we'd have a "non-canon alert" that can apply to both speculah and fanart (and other stuff too maybe). This should reduce the number of different-looking boxes on the pages, making said pages look more streamlined, and you get to keep the fanart disclaimers --Homerun-chan 11:54, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Basically, it's a good idea, that's what I've seen on other wikis, too. But we don't have a "speculah alert" right now, we've got separate boxes tagging confirmed, debunked and unconfirmed speculah. And I think that's a good way to segregate them. How would you unify fanart and speculah alerts as non-canon alert, while keeping proper confirmed/debunked/unconfirmed speculah tagging? --kFYatek 12:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)