User talk:Sondenise: Difference between revisions

From Puella Magi Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


::I'm not too familiar with this process, are we gonna restart the wiki from scratch this way? [[User:The Witch's House|The Witch's House]] 03:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
::I'm not too familiar with this process, are we gonna restart the wiki from scratch this way? [[User:The Witch's House|The Witch's House]] 03:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
:::Yes, I think that would be the best way. Old wiki would still be accessible in its current form (although read-only). Restructuring pages would be a lot easier that way, as current wiki is a mix of facts and speculation etc. Cost wise probably better as well as images belongs to old wiki can be dumped into bulk hosting. -- [[User:0x99|0x99]] 06:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:13, 27 April 2017

Hi! Thank you for your contribution. But may I ask why did you decided to blank Speculah pages? Thanks. -- 0x99 14:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Couple of people have been discussing this on /meduka/ (this thread) that the wiki needs a clean up to look like a proper wiki, and speculah isn't exactly part of what's canon, but speculation that doesn't really fit considering all we know now and that it adds nothing but fanon. --The Witch's House 20:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

OK, got it. I think the best way if we want to cleanup the Wiki is probably to archive the whole Wiki as read only (e.g. as old.puella-magi.net or something) and start clean, probably importing stuff from the old wiki. What do you think in that case? (I think this discussion better be moved to Main Page?) - 0x99 16:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not too familiar with this process, are we gonna restart the wiki from scratch this way? The Witch's House 03:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I think that would be the best way. Old wiki would still be accessible in its current form (although read-only). Restructuring pages would be a lot easier that way, as current wiki is a mix of facts and speculation etc. Cost wise probably better as well as images belongs to old wiki can be dumped into bulk hosting. -- 0x99 06:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)