Speculah talk:The Questing Beast Theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Regarding Debunk== | ==Regarding Debunk== | ||
Please note that the original wording of the Speculah states that "the design or naming of Kyuubey may have been influenced by the 'Questing Beast'" -- not that Kyuubey '''''is''''' the Questing Beast. Ergo, even if the name Kyuubey is specifically defined to have a given meaning, the Speculah is still valid, as it deals with the design considerations of the staff rather than facts within the canon. --[[User:Fallacies|Fallacies]] 00:08, 25 February 2011 (UCT) | Please note that the original wording of the Speculah states that "the design or naming of Kyuubey may have been influenced by the 'Questing Beast'" -- not that Kyuubey '''''is''''' the Questing Beast. Ergo, even if the name Kyuubey is specifically defined to have a given meaning, the Speculah is still valid, as it deals with the design considerations of the animation staff rather than facts within the canon. --[[User:Fallacies|Fallacies]] 00:08, 25 February 2011 (UCT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:11, 25 February 2011
Regarding Debunk
Please note that the original wording of the Speculah states that "the design or naming of Kyuubey may have been influenced by the 'Questing Beast'" -- not that Kyuubey is the Questing Beast. Ergo, even if the name Kyuubey is specifically defined to have a given meaning, the Speculah is still valid, as it deals with the design considerations of the animation staff rather than facts within the canon. --Fallacies 00:08, 25 February 2011 (UCT)