Talk:Deciphering the runes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Homerun-chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The rune font is pretty awesome. One improvement could be tho, that it could probably be adjusted better to the full height, instead of x-height. --[[User:Piparkaq|Piparkaq]] 03:25, 21 January 2011 (CST) | The rune font is pretty awesome. One improvement could be tho, that it could probably be adjusted better to the full height, instead of x-height. --[[User:Piparkaq|Piparkaq]] 03:25, 21 January 2011 (CST) | ||
Just wondering, why are there some parts in bold? If there is a particular reason (which I guess there is, there's no way shaftfags would do things randomly), then it should be explained somewhere (right before the chart maybe) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:54, 21 January 2011 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:54, 21 January 2011
This is a temporary layout. The translated parts should be displayed in a table or something; like one column for the screencap, one for the transcription/translation, and one for additional notes and speculah --[[Homerun-chan]] 12:45, 19 January 2011 (CST)
- Archaic 'L' and modern 'I' are the same. Archaic 'I' should be changed. Commie 06:30, 20 January 2011 (CST)
The rune font is pretty awesome. One improvement could be tho, that it could probably be adjusted better to the full height, instead of x-height. --Piparkaq 03:25, 21 January 2011 (CST)
Just wondering, why are there some parts in bold? If there is a particular reason (which I guess there is, there's no way shaftfags would do things randomly), then it should be explained somewhere (right before the chart maybe) --Homerun-chan 11:54, 21 January 2011 (CST)