Talk:Literature on Madoka: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Randomanon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Kind of tricky, this isn't an official document from the creators, but it's not exactly a fan blog either. I guess the intertextuality and literature section in articles is as good as anything. Also, someone make a contract to translate the whole thing. And then dump it on /a/. Every day until they like it. But more seriously, getting formal literary criticism is a good thing for the anime industry. [[User:KM|KM]] 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:47, 7 July 2011
I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --randomanon 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Kind of tricky, this isn't an official document from the creators, but it's not exactly a fan blog either. I guess the intertextuality and literature section in articles is as good as anything. Also, someone make a contract to translate the whole thing. And then dump it on /a/. Every day until they like it. But more seriously, getting formal literary criticism is a good thing for the anime industry. KM 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)