Talk:Sales Analysis: Difference between revisions

From Puella Magi Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Inviting numbers check, clarity check (is what's written and do the charts and graphs make sense?), questions, comments etc. on this topic.  Not sure where to link this one either to the wiki.  Given some people's sensitivity about sales as a topic, would like to make sure it's reasonably in good shape before making it public.  --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 03:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Inviting numbers check, clarity check (is what's written and do the charts and graphs make sense?), questions, comments etc. on this topic.  Not sure where to link this one either to the wiki.  Given some people's sensitivity about sales as a topic, would like to make sure it's reasonably in good shape before making it public.  --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 03:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
: At a glance, the projection and charts look rather solid and easy to understand to me. Best linked in the Articles category? One thing that I think could be improved on would be transforming the image with the current sales into a sortable wiki-table. (it might be easier to read?) --[[User:Knon|Knon]] 07:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
: At a glance, the projection and charts look rather solid and easy to understand to me. Best linked in the Articles category? One thing that I think could be improved on would be transforming the image with the current sales into a sortable wiki-table. (it might be easier to read?) --[[User:Knon|Knon]] 07:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
::I agree.  It's time to move this piece from your talk page to its own analysis section. - [[User:Prima|Prima]] 07:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:13, 8 July 2011

Inviting numbers check, clarity check (is what's written and do the charts and graphs make sense?), questions, comments etc. on this topic. Not sure where to link this one either to the wiki. Given some people's sensitivity about sales as a topic, would like to make sure it's reasonably in good shape before making it public. --randomanon 03:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

At a glance, the projection and charts look rather solid and easy to understand to me. Best linked in the Articles category? One thing that I think could be improved on would be transforming the image with the current sales into a sortable wiki-table. (it might be easier to read?) --Knon 07:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree. It's time to move this piece from your talk page to its own analysis section. - Prima 07:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)