User talk:Homerun-chan/Main Menu Redesign: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Homerun-chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Randomanon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Moving discussion of redesign here from the other page. I'd suggest not grouping light novel in with manga. Because we have other official books. See here: [http://wiki.puella-magi.net/Translated_Official_Documents_Miscellaneous#Official_Guides_and_Books]. You can change the naming convention there to all be Puella Magica if you want and make it NitroPlus Light Novel instead of Novel. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 19:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC) | Moving discussion of redesign here from the other page. I'd suggest not grouping light novel in with manga. Because we have other official books. See here: [http://wiki.puella-magi.net/Translated_Official_Documents_Miscellaneous#Official_Guides_and_Books]. You can change the naming convention there to all be Puella Magica if you want and make it NitroPlus Light Novel instead of Novel. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 19:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, at first the novel was a first-level item (just like Manga and Anime), but it just didn't look good, so I grouped it together with manga because "that's something with pages and stuff, yo". We can put it somewhere else (if it really belongs in this menu), but I don't really understand what you suggested. In the meantime, I tried to make a "books" section but then having a single item in the list looks a bit lonely ... --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 20:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC) | :Actually, at first the novel was a first-level item (just like Manga and Anime), but it just didn't look good, so I grouped it together with manga because "that's something with pages and stuff, yo". We can put it somewhere else (if it really belongs in this menu), but I don't really understand what you suggested. In the meantime, I tried to make a "books" section but then having a single item in the list looks a bit lonely ... --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 20:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Well tbh, I'm not sure by what criteria items are chosen to be lifted up to menu status. At the link I showed, there's also a comic anthology and a fan guidebook. They're all official books sponsored by Magica Quartet. You can leave out the fan guidebook since it's more like the magazine on background info on the anime, but the comic anthology will have Ume Aoki illustrations and doujin contributions by hanokage and other guests. It's probably similar to a spinoff manga where it will stay mostly consistent to canon but many would not consider it canon. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 20:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 28 July 2011
Moving discussion of redesign here from the other page. I'd suggest not grouping light novel in with manga. Because we have other official books. See here: [1]. You can change the naming convention there to all be Puella Magica if you want and make it NitroPlus Light Novel instead of Novel. --randomanon 19:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, at first the novel was a first-level item (just like Manga and Anime), but it just didn't look good, so I grouped it together with manga because "that's something with pages and stuff, yo". We can put it somewhere else (if it really belongs in this menu), but I don't really understand what you suggested. In the meantime, I tried to make a "books" section but then having a single item in the list looks a bit lonely ... --Homerun-chan 20:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well tbh, I'm not sure by what criteria items are chosen to be lifted up to menu status. At the link I showed, there's also a comic anthology and a fan guidebook. They're all official books sponsored by Magica Quartet. You can leave out the fan guidebook since it's more like the magazine on background info on the anime, but the comic anthology will have Ume Aoki illustrations and doujin contributions by hanokage and other guests. It's probably similar to a spinoff manga where it will stay mostly consistent to canon but many would not consider it canon. --randomanon 20:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)