User talk:Homerun-chan/Theory tags: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Version with symbols) |
Homerun-chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Version with symbols == | == Version with symbols == | ||
=== Mockup === | |||
<!-- Trying the "non-canon alert" at the same time. Can apply to both speculah and fanart --> | <!-- Trying the "non-canon alert" at the same time. Can apply to both speculah and fanart --> | ||
<div style="border: 1px solid #0000cc; border-left: 5px solid #0000cc; padding: 7px 10px; margin-bottom: 1em; background: #fff; {{#if: {{{margin}}}| margin-right: {{{margin}}}}}"> | <div style="border: 1px solid #0000cc; border-left: 5px solid #0000cc; padding: 7px 10px; margin-bottom: 1em; background: #fff; {{#if: {{{margin}}}| margin-right: {{{margin}}}}}"> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
*Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum vel lectus sapien. Vestibulum elementum, velit eu venenatis viverra, nibh mauris convallis tortor, non mattis augue nunc vehicula velit. Ut non turpis quis ante faucibus porttitor a id eros. Cras vehicula feugiat ultrices. Morbi ut nulla at dolor rutrum tincidunt vitae. | *Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum vel lectus sapien. Vestibulum elementum, velit eu venenatis viverra, nibh mauris convallis tortor, non mattis augue nunc vehicula velit. Ut non turpis quis ante faucibus porttitor a id eros. Cras vehicula feugiat ultrices. Morbi ut nulla at dolor rutrum tincidunt vitae. | ||
--[[User:KFYatek|kFYatek]] 12:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC) | === Discussion === | ||
I actually think that the symbols version is not legible enough. But if you insist on keeping pages free of unnecessary boxes, how about like that: (see above) --[[User:KFYatek|kFYatek]] 12:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Readability was an issue with this layout indeed (reason why I didn't template it). Your version is better in that regard indeed. Now the question is whether we prefer this layout over the current one or not -- a question I'll let you guys answer, I do not trust my sense of aesthetics at all --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 12:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:44, 17 May 2011
Version with symbols
Mockup
This section is non-canon.
Everything in this section is fanmade. Hence, please keep in mind that they may not be a reliable source.✔ Theories proven right
- This is a super important theory that has been proven right
- It is super-important indeed
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum vel lectus sapien. Vestibulum elementum, velit eu venenatis viverra, nibh mauris convallis tortor, non mattis augue nunc vehicula velit. Ut non turpis quis ante faucibus porttitor a id eros. Cras vehicula feugiat ultrices. Morbi ut nulla at dolor rutrum tincidunt vitae.
- Note that a theory is only marked as confirmed when an element from the franchise explicitly goes in the same direction. All other speculah, no matter how likely they seem, should go to the general namespace.
✖ Theories proven wrong
- This is a super important theory that has been proven false
- It is super-important indeed
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum vel lectus sapien. Vestibulum elementum, velit eu venenatis viverra, nibh mauris convallis tortor, non mattis augue nunc vehicula velit. Ut non turpis quis ante faucibus porttitor a id eros. Cras vehicula feugiat ultrices. Morbi ut nulla at dolor rutrum tincidunt vitae.
- Note that a theory is only marked as debunked when an element from the franchise explicitly goes against it. All other speculah, no matter how unlikely they seem, should go to the general namespace.
Unconfirmed theories
- This is a super important theory that has not be proven anything
- It is super-important indeed
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum vel lectus sapien. Vestibulum elementum, velit eu venenatis viverra, nibh mauris convallis tortor, non mattis augue nunc vehicula velit. Ut non turpis quis ante faucibus porttitor a id eros. Cras vehicula feugiat ultrices. Morbi ut nulla at dolor rutrum tincidunt vitae.
Discussion
I actually think that the symbols version is not legible enough. But if you insist on keeping pages free of unnecessary boxes, how about like that: (see above) --kFYatek 12:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Readability was an issue with this layout indeed (reason why I didn't template it). Your version is better in that regard indeed. Now the question is whether we prefer this layout over the current one or not -- a question I'll let you guys answer, I do not trust my sense of aesthetics at all --Homerun-chan 12:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)