Talk:Yuuri

Chapter 5, oh my god. What the hell am I going to do with this page, now? Fffffffff --BrickBreak 19:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't know either; who the heck could have predicted that? My thought is that we make a single page called "Yuuri" and say that the name belongs to two characters in Kazumi Magica. We then have two links: one goes to Airi/Yuuri and the other goes to the real Yuuri (which we can just call Yuuri Asuka). And since we don't have witch names, we'll probably have to show their witch forms on their own pages. --Universalperson 19:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Check these test pages Universalperson/Yuuri, Universalperson/Airi and Universalperson/Yuuri_Asuka. -- Universalperson 11:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your page on the real Yuuri is great, and I'd put it up immediately. However, I don't know if renaming the current page to Airi would be the best solution. I mean, it is one huge spoiler. It would be like changing Kyubey's page to Incubator.
That said, I'm out of ideas. I say we should wait for the scanlation to come out, so we can get fresh minds thinking on this. --BrickBreak 19:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I was thinking about waiting for scanlations before I actually move anything. However, we do need some way to differentiate the two Yuuris. And this wiki is full of spoilers already ---Universalperson 20:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Maybe so, but not in the page titles... and Kyubey is the only precedent I can think of. For now, and pending future changes of heart (I am dyiiiiiiiiiiiiing, burying freshmen is tiring), my proposal is such: a 3-page solution, keeping the current Yuuri page and your real Yuuri one, but creating one for Airi alone, which would focus more on her period as Airi, with a summarized version of her acts as the "new" Yuuri, which would be covered more thoroughly on the current Yuuri page. --BrickBreak 20:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

As long as the solution doesnt spoil anything, I will agree to it. We dont want to expose to newcomers to the truth and then receive angry messages of how they got spoiled. --Mutopis 21:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

But what about the list of characters with pictures? Do we just have two Yuuri's and one Airi, or what? --Universalperson 01:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I think we should put Airi with a spoiler alert. If we but two Yuuris it may spoil everything. I dont know. --Mutopis 01:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

The scanlations are up. Should I move/replace the pages now?--Universalperson 12:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Wait for more opinions, that is why we were waiting for scanlations anyway. Anyway, I've given it a bit more thought. There is not need to put the real Yuuri nor Airi in the char box. For the story's purpose, Yuuri is Airi: her life as Airi is mere background. The same can be said for the real Yuuri. They should still have their pages, and have (spoilered) summaries in the general pages. What do you think.

Eh, I see no problem. --Universalperson 12:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Same, we should keep them separate. Technically they are background/minor charact. that is important to the plot --Mutopis 17:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm just saying, for spoiler purposes, we shouldn't have them in the character table, at least not right now. --BrickBreak 18:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree with this; Airi and Asuka Yuuri are a bit too spoilery to put them in the table with pictures. They definitely do need pages, though. --CrownClown 21:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't think there's a problem in putting them into the character table. If someone doesn't know Airi, he wouldn't read her page. But perhaps this page should be slimmed down to only the personality and history parts. The page shouldn't mention Airi or the real Yuuri at first. It should simply state how the character Yuuri appears to the reader/what she does in chapter 1-4, and after a spoilered explanation of chapter 5 link to the real Yuuri and Airi's pages. --TATZL 21:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

When it comes to the character table, the problem isn't so much Airi, but the real Yuuri. We'd have two Yuuris on the table... --BrickBreak 21:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Can we add them now? --Universalperson 13:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. --BrickBreak 13:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)