Speculah talk:Let's Predict the Ending: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
There's two because that was directly copied off the charts. The white chart was standalone, and I got the idea for the black chart later from clever twist/parody/troll endings in /a/ replies to the white one, so it's a little weird when they're combined into one list. I'll switch the second version to "Morning Rescue End, Literally" | There's two because that was directly copied off the charts. The white chart was standalone, and I got the idea for the black chart later from clever twist/parody/troll endings in /a/ replies to the white one, so it's a little weird when they're combined into one list. I'll switch the second version to "Morning Rescue End, Literally" | ||
:Why can't I hold all these morning rescue ends? [[User:Prima|Prima]] 07:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Ending template? == | == Ending template? == | ||
Revision as of 07:03, 20 March 2011
I don't find No End to be Humorous. ;_; Prima 01:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Being No End is suffering.
Morning Rescue End
Just sayan', but we have two Morning Rescue Ends. (first one and last one) --Homerun-chan 15:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- I thought that was User:KFYatek's joke, so didn't bother fixing it. Prima 16:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
There's two because that was directly copied off the charts. The white chart was standalone, and I got the idea for the black chart later from clever twist/parody/troll endings in /a/ replies to the white one, so it's a little weird when they're combined into one list. I'll switch the second version to "Morning Rescue End, Literally"
- Why can't I hold all these morning rescue ends? Prima 07:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Ending template?
Is it possible to make a template similar to Talk:Wish_theories for endings, so this page will look more like Wish_theories? Prima 14:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think it was discussed somewhere that since there is only one ending possible, eventually all the endings save one will become debunked, so there's not really a point in doing that. --KFYatek 14:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)