Talk:Literature on Madoka: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Randomanon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm probably gonna buy this. I'm not enough of a masochist to do 224 pages of literary analysis. Is there a chapter you guys really want? --Sae, (sometime) July 18th | |||
I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Kind of tricky, this isn't an official document from the creators, but it's not exactly a fan blog either. I guess the intertextuality and literature section in articles is as good as anything. Also, someone make a contract to translate the whole thing. And then dump it on /a/. Every day until they like it. But more seriously, getting formal literary criticism is a good thing for the anime industry. [[User:KM|KM]] 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | :Kind of tricky, this isn't an official document from the creators, but it's not exactly a fan blog either. I guess the intertextuality and literature section in articles is as good as anything. Also, someone make a contract to translate the whole thing. And then dump it on /a/. Every day until they like it. But more seriously, getting formal literary criticism is a good thing for the anime industry. [[User:KM|KM]] 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Any idea who will be the publisher? I think we need to post as much info as possible --[[User:Mutopis|Mutopis]] 19:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | :Any idea who will be the publisher? I think we need to post as much info as possible --[[User:Mutopis|Mutopis]] 19:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::The info is linked. Publisher, pricing everything. There's nothing more to really know until it actually gets released sometime next month. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ::The info is linked. Publisher, pricing everything. There's nothing more to really know until it actually gets released sometime next month. --[[User:Randomanon|randomanon]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:30, 18 July 2011
I'm probably gonna buy this. I'm not enough of a masochist to do 224 pages of literary analysis. Is there a chapter you guys really want? --Sae, (sometime) July 18th
I'm unsure where to link this to, but it deserved it's own page. Especially if/when we see books in the future for Madoka. --randomanon 14:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Kind of tricky, this isn't an official document from the creators, but it's not exactly a fan blog either. I guess the intertextuality and literature section in articles is as good as anything. Also, someone make a contract to translate the whole thing. And then dump it on /a/. Every day until they like it. But more seriously, getting formal literary criticism is a good thing for the anime industry. KM 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Any idea who will be the publisher? I think we need to post as much info as possible --Mutopis 19:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- The info is linked. Publisher, pricing everything. There's nothing more to really know until it actually gets released sometime next month. --randomanon 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)