User talk:0x99/Debunked: Difference between revisions

From Puella Magi Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
:I've changed it to what you've suggested, but I feel it's a bit too long. Any ideas? --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
:I've changed it to what you've suggested, but I feel it's a bit too long. Any ideas? --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
::Now that I've looked at it once again, it seems okay to me if we use it as a header (like the spoiler/speculah alerts). I doesn't seem too long if we ue it that way. Then, I'd add a short notice next to the theory title on the Articles page, something like this:
::'''[[Speculah:Count_Kyouko_Theory|Wonderful Theory]]''' <span style="color:#EE0000">'''(Proven wrong in episode x)'''</span>
::And of course, something similar but less scary for confirmed theories. --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 22:03, 25 February 2011 (UCT)

Revision as of 22:03, 25 February 2011

The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --Homerun-chan 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)

I've changed it to what you've suggested, but I feel it's a bit too long. Any ideas? --0x99 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
Now that I've looked at it once again, it seems okay to me if we use it as a header (like the spoiler/speculah alerts). I doesn't seem too long if we ue it that way. Then, I'd add a short notice next to the theory title on the Articles page, something like this:
Wonderful Theory (Proven wrong in episode x)
And of course, something similar but less scary for confirmed theories. --Homerun-chan 22:03, 25 February 2011 (UCT)