User talk:0x99/Debunked: Difference between revisions

From Puella Magi Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived her...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)
:I've changed it to what you've suggested, but I feel it's a bit too long. Any ideas? --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UCT)

Revision as of 23:54, 24 February 2011

The layout is nice but the wording is strange. (For example, 'It is archived here but never take it as a fact.' sounds kinda weird IMO... Maybe something like 'It is archived here for the sake of completeness, but please don't take it as facts' would be better?) --Homerun-chan 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UCT)

I've changed it to what you've suggested, but I feel it's a bit too long. Any ideas? --0x99 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UCT)