User talk:WizardFlower: Difference between revisions
WizardFlower (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Oh some relatives had full names already and I understood that it was the way we currently went with in the wiki. (Ntm most wikis usually include full name in Relatives section. | Oh some relatives had full names already and I understood that it was the way we currently went with in the wiki. (Ntm most wikis usually include full name in Relatives section. | ||
[[User:WizardFlower|WizardFlower]] ([[User talk:WizardFlower|talk]]) 21:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | [[User:WizardFlower|WizardFlower]] ([[User talk:WizardFlower|talk]]) 21:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
I don't know of anything to suggest that one way is preferred over the other on this wiki. I feel that it's pointless and redundant to include the surnames when they're the same, though. And what other wikis do is their own business. Anyway, I'm just stating my opinion, not trying to force anything. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 22:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:09, 21 May 2023
Relatives
Why are you showing each relative's full name? I think it makes more sense to only show the given name as long as they share the same surname, because that's assumed. ~ Celtic Minstrel (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Oh some relatives had full names already and I understood that it was the way we currently went with in the wiki. (Ntm most wikis usually include full name in Relatives section. WizardFlower (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't know of anything to suggest that one way is preferred over the other on this wiki. I feel that it's pointless and redundant to include the surnames when they're the same, though. And what other wikis do is their own business. Anyway, I'm just stating my opinion, not trying to force anything. ~ Celtic Minstrel (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)