Talk:Mami's mammies

いったい　何が...219.90.149.146 10:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Shaft, look what you've done. People started to do maths out of boredom, and now it seems like we're on a verge of creating The Church of Mami's Boobs. Look, Shaft - that's what you get by not letting your fans get their weekly Madoka fix. Is this really what you wanted? YES, I WANT MY MADOKA FIX NAO TOO! ;_; ...and, on a second thought, Mami's Mammies are quite pleasant thing to pray to... --KFYatek 14:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

What the fuck am I reading.jpg
And KFYatek, I can only fear what will come out of this second week of abstinence, now that it's pretty likely Madoka won't air on the 24th. --Homerun-chan 16:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

dear lord what the fuck is wrong with you people

Best article ever --69.43.65.73 15:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Come on, moderators. Please delete this thing from the wiki and ship it off to 4-chan where it belongs. 64.89.144.100 00:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

nofunallowed.jpg. Anyhoo, god bless the soul who wrote this. 24.7.149.6 18:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

tastelessobjectivization.jpg?

Cut that. It's kept for humorous purposes. Nothing more, nothing less. BrickBreak 20:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

As a sysop, I see no reason to delete this page since it's not harmful to the wiki in any way. It's not really visible (only one link from the rest of the wiki), and it's not like there were lots of pages like this or anything.
As a visitor, I have to admit I find it a bit tasteless though, but whatever ... --Homerun-chan 21:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I found out about this page as I was trying to search "Mami's soulgem" on Google, but the auto-search had Mami's mammies come up first. I think this is a wonderful page, and should totally stay. Like someone said before, it's totally humorous, and should stay around. Dnguyen1319 12:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Someone please delete this article!

Learn to read. Protip, it's the message just above yours. --Homerun-chan 15:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

i thought this wiki should show serious things about the show and not have crappy pages like on the encyclopedia dramatica

As I said above, there is only one crappy page I'm aware of, and there's basically only one link to it, so it's not really that intrusive. If more pages like this were to appear, then all of them would be deleted (including this one, because I agree with you on that this wiki should stay serious in overall). Experience has shown this is not the case though, as only this very page exists. --Homerun-chan 16:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know this was fucking Encyclopeida Dramatica. Why does this page NEED to exist? It's utterly tasteless and fucking irritating to look at or have even have a link to. -- [User:|Anon]

It doesn't NEED to, it's just a joke page. We've only got a few of them, lighten up a little. Besides, you keep deleting official info about Mami's breasts from the Mami Tomoe page. Do you have something against an anime girl having a visible chest, even if she was purposefully designed that way? -- CrownClown 01:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, you obviously have a problem when you've attempted multiple times to delete the official translation from Ume Aoki, Madoka's original character designer, where she explicitly talks about Mami's breasts as part of her design. I don't care for this page but I care even less for someone who attempts to censor the truth based on his or her personal bias. --randomanon 01:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Stop deleting official information, you vandal, no one takes you seriously the moment you tried your hand at censorship. --Mutopis 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

This page looks like ED to you? Its tone makes it look more like something straight out of the as-irreverant-as-it-is-informative Transformers Wiki to me. Pikawil 05:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I know, I know, old news. BUT if this page absolutely MUST stay around, it should at least be marked as a joke page. It contains non-canon information that is not only under the speculations, which is against the guidelines. SAYAKAMI 14:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

does this website REALLY need this page though? why does a wiki need a joke page? plus, I don't think it fits with wiki standards and stuff. -salty anon

Yeah, I agree. This page is really unnecessary, as well as just plain gross. It's best removed. Sevv 05:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

"just plain gross." Your tumblr is showing. Though I would request that some sort of disclaimer or tag be added to the page that states it's a joke. Although it's obvious after reading for a bit that it's just a made-up joke page, it can be confusing for new visitors who find it.Quixotick 01:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Goddamn tumblrina puritans, amirite?--Arisboch (talk) 13:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)