Talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
Homerun-chan (talk | contribs) (→Refactoring: Trying with the blank card) |
Homerun-chan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;text-align:center;" | {|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;text-align:center;" | ||
!colspan="6"|Witches and | !colspan="6"|Witches and familiars | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Gertrud.png|120px|link=Gertrud]] | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Gertrud.png|120px|link=Gertrud]] | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[File:Card blank.png|thumb]] | |||
I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the [[Sayaka]] article should be moved to the [[Oktavia]] article. -- [[User:Anon-kun|Anon-kun]] 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the [[Sayaka]] article should be moved to the [[Oktavia]] article. -- [[User:Anon-kun|Anon-kun]] 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Line 75: | Line 77: | ||
:How about a strong line like this? (See above) --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :How about a strong line like this? (See above) --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars? | |||
:Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
[[ | ::Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It ''is'' Suleika's card after all) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:31, 18 March 2011
Walpurgis Night
Walpurgis Night has been confirmed to be a witch on the official website. Hence, I added a link to the speculah article here. When more info on the witch is gathered, I think we should make a separate page for the witch herself. --Homerun-chan 18:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Refactoring
I like that new design. We should apply it to the witches section too. The problem is that using the cards as images renders pretty meh (see below -- the biggest problem is that we lack a lot of cards). Any idea? --Homerun-chan 16:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the Sayaka article should be moved to the Oktavia article. -- Anon-kun 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Anon-kun about the lines. I think a ? pic would be better than a screenshot. And can someone take a look at the speculah on Gertrud I added (under talk)? --Cleo 21:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- How about a strong line like this? (See above) --0x99 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars?
- Here's a blanked card Prima 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It is Suleika's card after all) --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)