Talk:Characters: Difference between revisions

From Puella Magi Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:


[[File:Card blank.png|thumb]]
[[File:Card blank.png|thumb]]
[[File:Card blank2.png|thumb]]


I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the [[Sayaka]] article should be moved to the [[Oktavia]] article. -- [[User:Anon-kun|Anon-kun]] 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the [[Sayaka]] article should be moved to the [[Oktavia]] article. -- [[User:Anon-kun|Anon-kun]] 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Line 81: Line 82:
:Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
:Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
::Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It ''is'' Suleika's card after all) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
::Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It ''is'' Suleika's card after all) --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
:::Here's something different. It's not polished at all (especially the runetext at the top which looks funny for now) but that shows another concept --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:41, 18 March 2011

Walpurgis Night

Walpurgis Night has been confirmed to be a witch on the official website. Hence, I added a link to the speculah article here. When more info on the witch is gathered, I think we should make a separate page for the witch herself. --Homerun-chan 18:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Refactoring

I like that new design. We should apply it to the witches section too. The problem is that using the cards as images renders pretty meh (see below -- the biggest problem is that we lack a lot of cards). Any idea? --Homerun-chan 16:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Witches and familiars
Card Gertrud.png Card Suleika.png Card Charlotte.png Card Elly.png File:Card Albertine.png Card Gisela.png
Gertrud Suleika Charlotte Elly (Kristen) Albertine Gisela
AnthonyAdelbert Ulla Pyotr Danyyiel & Jennifer Anja Sebastian's
Card Uhrmann.png Card Oktavia.png Card blank.png Card blank.png Card blank.png Card blank.png
Uhrmann Oktavia von Seckendorff Isadel Patricia Roberta Kriemhild Gretchen
Holger
Card blank.png
Walpurgis Night
Card blank.png
Card blank2.png

I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the Sayaka article should be moved to the Oktavia article. -- Anon-kun 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Anon-kun about the lines. I think a ? pic would be better than a screenshot. And can someone take a look at the speculah on Gertrud I added (under talk)? --Cleo 21:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
How about a strong line like this? (See above) --0x99 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars?
Here's a blanked card Prima 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It is Suleika's card after all) --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Here's something different. It's not polished at all (especially the runetext at the top which looks funny for now) but that shows another concept --Homerun-chan 11:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)