Talk:Mami's mammies

いったい　何が...219.90.149.146 10:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Shaft, look what you've done. People started to do maths out of boredom, and now it seems like we're on a verge of creating The Church of Mami's Boobs. Look, Shaft - that's what you get by not letting your fans get their weekly Madoka fix. Is this really what you wanted? YES, I WANT MY MADOKA FIX NAO TOO! ;_; ...and, on a second thought, Mami's Mammies are quite pleasant thing to pray to... --KFYatek 14:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

What the fuck am I reading.jpg
And KFYatek, I can only fear what will come out of this second week of abstinence, now that it's pretty likely Madoka won't air on the 24th. --Homerun-chan 16:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

dear lord what the fuck is wrong with you people

Best article ever --69.43.65.73 15:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Come on, moderators. Please delete this thing from the wiki and ship it off to 4-chan where it belongs. 64.89.144.100 00:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

nofunallowed.jpg. Anyhoo, god bless the soul who wrote this. 24.7.149.6 18:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

tastelessobjectivization.jpg?

Cut that. It's kept for humorous purposes. Nothing more, nothing less. BrickBreak 20:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

As a sysop, I see no reason to delete this page since it's not harmful to the wiki in any way. It's not really visible (only one link from the rest of the wiki), and it's not like there were lots of pages like this or anything.
As a visitor, I have to admit I find it a bit tasteless though, but whatever ... --Homerun-chan 21:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Someone please delete this article!

Learn to read. Protip, it's the message just above yours. --Homerun-chan 15:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

i thought this wiki should show serious things about the show and not have crappy pages like on the encyclopedia dramatica

As I said above, there is only one crappy page I'm aware of, and there's basically only one link to it, so it's not really that intrusive. If more pages like this were to appear, then all of them would be deleted (including this one, because I agree with you on that this wiki should stay serious in overall). Experience has shown this is not the case though, as only this very page exists. --Homerun-chan 16:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)