Talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I like that new design. We should apply it to the witches section too. The problem is that using the cards as images renders pretty meh (see below -- the biggest problem is that we lack a lot of cards). Any idea? --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 16:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | I like that new design. We should apply it to the witches section too. The problem is that using the cards as images renders pretty meh (see below -- the biggest problem is that we lack a lot of cards). Any idea? --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 16:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;text-align:center;" | {|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;text-align:center;border:none;" | ||
!colspan="6"|Witches and familiars | !colspan="6"|Witches and familiars | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|[[Ulla]] | |[[Ulla]] | ||
|[[Pyotr]] | |[[Pyotr]] | ||
|[[ | |[[Daniyyel]] — [[Jennifer]] | ||
|[[Anja]] | |[[Anja]] | ||
|[[ | |[[Dora]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="6" style="background:# | |colspan="6" style="background:#fff;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:3px;"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Elsa Maria.png|120px|link=Elsa Maria]] | |||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Uhrmann.png|120px|link=Uhrmann]] | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Uhrmann.png|120px|link=Uhrmann]] | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Oktavia.png|120px|link=Oktavia von Seckendorff]] | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card Oktavia.png|120px|link=Oktavia von Seckendorff]] | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Patricia]] | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Patricia]] | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Roberta]] | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Roberta]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''[[Elsa Maria]]''' | |||
|'''[[Uhrmann]]''' | |'''[[Uhrmann]]''' | ||
|'''[[Oktavia von Seckendorff]]''' | |'''[[Oktavia von Seckendorff]]''' | ||
Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
|'''[[Patricia]]''' | |'''[[Patricia]]''' | ||
|'''[[Roberta]]''' | |'''[[Roberta]]''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Sebastian|Sebastian's]] | |||
|[[Bartels]] | |||
|[[Holger]] | |[[Holger]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="6" style="background:# | |colspan="6" style="background:#fff;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:3px;"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="width:16.5%; | |style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Kriemhild Gretchen]] | ||
|style="width:16.5%;"|[[File:Card blank.png|120px|link=Speculah:Walpurgis Night]] | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''[[Kriemhild Gretchen]]''' | |||
|'''[[Speculah:Walpurgis Night|Walpurgis Night]]''' | |'''[[Speculah:Walpurgis Night|Walpurgis Night]]''' | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
:How about a strong line like this? (See above) --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :How about a strong line like this? (See above) --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars? | ::I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars? --[[User:Homerun-chan|Homerun-chan]] 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::I tried doing what you suggested, but it looks weird because padding in the top cell and bottom cell are merged together; what do you think if I changed the strong line to a simple space like this? --[[User:0x99|0x99]] 15:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :Here's a blanked card [[User:Prima|Prima]] 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:27, 18 March 2011
Walpurgis Night
Walpurgis Night has been confirmed to be a witch on the official website. Hence, I added a link to the speculah article here. When more info on the witch is gathered, I think we should make a separate page for the witch herself. --Homerun-chan 18:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Refactoring
I like that new design. We should apply it to the witches section too. The problem is that using the cards as images renders pretty meh (see below -- the biggest problem is that we lack a lot of cards). Any idea? --Homerun-chan 16:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I like it, but the lines between cards and links should be removed. We could use normal screenshots for the missing pictures or a ? pic like Suleika if the character did not appear in the series. On a related note, the parts about the witch in the Sayaka article should be moved to the Oktavia article. -- Anon-kun 18:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Anon-kun about the lines. I think a ? pic would be better than a screenshot. And can someone take a look at the speculah on Gertrud I added (under talk)? --Cleo 21:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- How about a strong line like this? (See above) --0x99 06:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars? --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- I tried doing what you suggested, but it looks weird because padding in the top cell and bottom cell are merged together; what do you think if I changed the strong line to a simple space like this? --0x99 15:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about the strong line. I think it catches too much attention. Maybe keep the normal line between the card and the names, but remove it between the witche's name and its familiars? --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Here's a blanked card Prima 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It is Suleika's card after all) --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Here's something different. It's not polished at all (especially the runetext at the top which looks funny for now) but that shows another concept --Homerun-chan 11:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cleaned a little, changed the texture to give it a slightly different look. Revert it to version two if it's unsightly. Prima 11:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Tried adding the blank card. Generally speaking, it looks good IMO, but maybe we should change the question mark's style a bit, it look too much like Suleika's card right now (well... It is Suleika's card after all) --Homerun-chan 11:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)